![]() |
The Theatre Royal auditorium showing the Dress Circle |
![]() |
William Wilkins 1778-1839 |
![]() |
Sir Peter Hall 1930-2017 |
![]() |
The Theatre Royal auditorium showing the Dress Circle |
![]() |
William Wilkins 1778-1839 |
![]() |
Sir Peter Hall 1930-2017 |
![]() |
Jacob Rees Mogg denigrating the photo ID rule change as 'gerrymandering.' |
![]() |
Suella in full flow at the Nat-C Conference |
sieved from the current Tory party, which has been meeting and opining, often in a rather baffling way! Non-Conservative media people seem to have been outlawed from the proceedings, while Jacob Rees-Mogg reckoned that the voter photo ID rule change, introduced by the Government, had proved to be gerrymandering. However the most incomprehensible representative has continued to be Suella Braverman, the current Home Secretary, seemingly obsessed with reducing the numbers of immigrants, no matter how they get into the country but especially if they arrive in small boats which have miraculously, desperately, survived the Channel crossing. She is determined to “bring overall numbers down” but a recent Home Office analysis suggests that there will be more ‘spikes’ via work and study applications which may well increase by up to 40%. There are various Govt. proposals to reduce the appeal of studying for a Masters or a PhD in Britain such as time limits for students to remain, or the outlawing of family members accompanying students during their study period. Obviously, we wouldn’t seek to make students feel at home during their stay; who wants really bright people to like it here? It is these proposals which have particularly baffled me; increases in applications for bona fide students seem to be seen as threatening somehow instead of complimentary; tributes to the positives of choosing to study at Britain’s universities or colleges. Increasing student applications are surely A Good Thing not a furtive back door manoeuvre to smuggle foreigners in and
![]() |
Andrew Marr |
![]() |
House of Lords |
The Sortition Foundation has produced a thoughtful booklet with coherent arguments for abolishing the anachronistic House of Lords and substituting a House of Citizens. It reads well with its very attractive proposals to remove the Lords and establish a House of Citizens as a Second Chamber, selected by democratic lottery to represent a microcosm of the U.K. The idea is a-political [how attractive is that?] and would place the U.K. at the forefront of democratic innovation as a global leader in citizen empowerment and engagement.
An example of this approach already up and running is given as a case study. It is the Second Chamber in the Ostbelgien [East Belgian] Parliament. This relates to the small German-speaking community which voted to establish a permanent Citizens’ Council of 24 people meeting for 1.5 year terms in early 2019. This group can propose up to three topics for consideration by separate Citizens’ Panels whose recommendations are submitted to the elected Parliament which must then consider and publicly respond to them. This does sound more democratic [and attractive] than the House of Lords composed of hereditary peers and chiefly political allies rewarded for services by their political friends and masters. ***
![]() |
Permanent Citizen's Council "The Oosbelgien-Model" |
Two shots of the Great Graveyard with gravestones peeping out from, or totally hidden by. Cow Parsley Rampant. |
I am starting to taper off my self-imposed house arrest as I await the return of a fugitive energy and for the last two mornings I have done part of what was my usual early morning walk in the Abbey Gardens. I was amazed at the extraordinary growth of the ubiquitous cow parsley during my modest absence. It is particularly impressive in much of the Great Graveyard where ancient headstones are either totally submerged in the rampant white and green glory, or simply craning their necks to show the tips of their memorials. It is actually a glorious sight, relatively short-lived but concentrated and almost giddy in its display!! I meet few walkers, mainly with their dogs, but almost everyone this morning, for example, made some joyful comment on the plethora of white bobbing floral heads. Even an ebullient mood can shift up a gear apparently when witnessing a minor floral miracle!!
More pleasing colours in the fabled Abbey Gardens. |
The chestnut and the lilac, the latter rather paler in this photo. |
The other touch of Nature I noticed this morning was as I returned towards the North exit to the gardens, leading to Angel Hill. A tall chestnut tree is in abundant flower and to its left, a dark purple lilac. I was suddenly and irresistibly reminded of a poem I used when I trained a speech choir in a secondary school, for some local cultural competition, about sixty years ago. I could remember brief snatches but when I consulted Google, I was amazed at the sheer length and breadth of the poem, by Alfred Noyes, none of which I could recall! Here is the appropriate extract from what appears to be a hundred other stanzas!
For Noah hardly knew a bird of any kind that isn't heard
At Kew, at Kew in lilac-time (and oh, so near to London!
![]() |
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Fine bone china mug with lilac design. £14. |
You'll hear the rest without a doubt, all chorusing for London: --
![]() |
The complexity of memory |
Faded voices |
![]() |
Also labelled Myalgic Encephalomyelitis |
To the cinema for a welcome respite from long and mainly empty days! I am in self-imposed purdah in an attempt to coax back my normal energy which went AWOL at the end of Easter after I managed to do in one week that which would normally take three weeks! Chiefly, it must be said, by happenstance and coincidence but also plus a lack of personal judgement I suppose. I had quite forgotten that there is an outside chance of the M.E. fatigue returning if I seriously overdo things. Obviously, now I remember!
Anyway
the Abbeygate Cinema is perhaps a 2/3 minute stroll/stagger from
where I live and it is one of my most admired buildings in Bury, it
having a curved and authentic Art Deco frontage which warms the heart
and lifts the eye each time I go past. Built in 1920 and over 100
years later, it is still effortlessly elegant and stylish. One of the
many pluses to living here. I hadn’t immediately heard of The
Unlikely Pilgrimage of Harold Fry but, after I decided A Treat
was needed, I looked at the film list online and as it happens, I
only needed to read that Jim Broadbent and Penelope Wilton were the
leads for me to acquire a ticket. No further recommendation required!
I since happen to have read two reviews of ‘Harold’, one in Friday’s Times [28/04/2023] by Kevin Maher who judged the film, ‘superb’ and one in the New Statesman [28/04//4/05/2023] by David Sexton who decided it was ‘suitably plodding’.] So off this Sunday morning to view it for myself. Harold Fry is a man who has never, knowingly, left the sidelines of life, but who, en route to post a letter to a former colleague, Queenie, in response to hers bidding him farewell as she is dying from cancer, chats to a girl with blue hair in a garage shop who tells him, “If you have faith, you can do anything.” Untypically, Harold is inspired and decides, on the spot, to set off immediately from Kingsbridge, in Devon, to walk to Berwick-on-Tweed in the sudden firm belief that while he walks, Queenie will live, waiting for him to arrive. It is thus that he decides he is going to prolong her life.
![]() |
Harold's long, cathartic walk |
“I’ve spent my life not doing anything. And now, at last, I am.” One of the characters he meets briefly on his extraordinary walk, is a cancer surgeon who tells Harold bluntly that it is only medicine, not faith, that can cure cancer but Harold merely nods amiably and ignores the message. Here is a true pilgrim who believes.
During his 627 mile walk [this is a man who generally only walks to the car, as his wife forcefully points out] we learn of the many regrets and mistakes of his past 65 years while he trudges on meeting, by happenstance, a random cast of characters both kind and well-intentioned as well as damaged and dishonest. As he chats to strangers in cafes or coffee shops, innocently telling passers-by of his quest to help his old friend, Queenie, so his quiet confidences are unexpectedly spread and he becomes, mysteriously [to him], famous with a noisy growing group of disparate fellow travellers apparently wanting to support him, who deepen his understanding of others and, critically, of himself, but who also slow him down and with whom he does not travel in comfort.
![]() |
Some of the unlikely fellow travellers Harold attracts |
![]() |
Harold Fry and wife Maureen, the unlikely survivors of an arid marriage |
![]() |
Harold deciding not to post the letter but to walk |
Pilgrimage is the perfect word for Harold’s odyssey; he is hoping for personal salvation, without consciously realising that, and he is subconsciously seeking a miracle as recompense for Queenie whom he wronged by default many years ago. He neglects to inform Maureen, his wife, of his suddenly-intended, epic journey, [he had just popped out to post a letter]; their sterile, frigid relationship, effectively ended 25 years before when their only son, gifted but disturbed, hung himself, and here portrayed in simple relentless dialogue. Maureen tells him in one phone call, “I hardly notice you’re gone.” To a supportive neighbour, she says, “It would be easier if he were dead; at least, I’d know where I stand.” Maureen is repressed and cannot tolerate uncertainty but barely registers the austerity and emotional indifference of the Fry everyday life. Its sheer barren predictability is of comfort to her. This wasteland is beautifully conveyed through her endless, unnecessary vacuuming and polishing of already immaculate surfaces plus the sight of the net curtains blowing in profusion to ensure privacy, and the white walls of their home, bare of any paintings or photos.
![]() |
Jim Broadbent as Harold Fry. Perhaps his finest performance. |
Both Jim Broadbent and Penelope Wilton are, as ever, superb. Broadbent is wretchedly sad as Harold, increasingly depressed as he looks over his past life and yet mutely resilient in an unknowing, poignant way. He doesn’t exactly blunder through life but he does continue, in the face of insuperable odds, to keep on, keeping on, as Alan Bennett might say. His face becomes more weathered, more lined, more bearded and be-whiskered as he journeys on and his gradual realisation of things not said, or done, in the past, is slyly portrayed in a way that suggests this could ultimately be, a story of redemption. Penelope Wilton as Maureen is repressed and repressive, never forgiving Harold for past errors, resigned to her grief over her son David and for Harold’s shortcomings in that relationship. The ending with the pair speaking honestly about the past and their conflicted remorse, suggests the dignity and endurance that old age can possess ….. and the regret.
![]() |
Penelope Wilton as Maureen Fry. Another magical portrayal. |
![]() |
A pilgrim contemplates |
![]() |
The original book by Rachel Joyce. First edition available, signed, for £120. |
Oleg Gordievsky 1938-2025 The second recent death of a notable man, as mentioned in my previous blog, was that of Oleg Gordievsky, and the p...