![]() |
| Prison can be both punishing and reforming |
As prison places become more difficult to find for an increasing number of criminals, it seems a good idea to consider alternatives to imprisonment, but perhaps a better place to start is to think about the entire subject of criminals and how society contains and/or punishes them.
There are
reasons why the ‘socially straight’ might want protection from people
who steal from them or attack them or deceive them to gain material benefits
for themselves. There is less agreement on how to deal with, i.e. how to punish,
offenders, but there are four possible reasons for sanction: retribution;
deterrence; rehabilitation; incapacitation.
Society generally considers prison to be the most appropriate punishment for a range of crimes, and this solution both incapacitates the offender, removed as he is from society and opportunities for further criminal activity while giving the opportunity and seclusion for serious reflection. Loss of liberty is also a punishment which may bring resentment and resistance. Meanwhile, the victim has the satisfaction of seeing appropriate punishment for offenders and the relief of the offender being removed from the
scene, albeit temporarily. It is also hoped that the possibility of prison will deter the criminal from future offending behaviour, but in the British system, the additional idea of targeted rehabilitation for the offender seems relatively remote. Rehabilitation is shown to help ease the offender’s re-entry into society and yet is less widely used with adults than other sanctions, although popular when treating juvenile offenders where it is effective.
In spite of societal approval for imprisonment, decades of research show that while prison removes the offender from his normal life and with it, opportunities for committing further crimes, while also carrying an unwelcome societal stigma for the perpetrator, research also shows that it is the least effective place in which to rehabilitate offenders. In fact, some studies show that a stint in prison
increases the likelihood that inmates will reoffend
One widespread attempt at a solution to the problem of punishment is Probation. This allows low-risk or first-time offenders to remain in their community under close court-imposed conditions while receiving therapy such as counselling or treatment programmes promoting behavioural reform. The emphasis of these counselling and behavioural reform programmes must be on promoting hope and motivation. Probation is less expensive than imprisonment and can help maintain family ties while enabling offenders to continue working, earning and paying taxes thus contributing positively to the community. Probation also has the added benefits of reducing social stigma and aiding reintegration.
The chief
risk to success is recidivism. Despite close supervision, a significant
proportion of probationers, up to half of all offenders, reoffend. There is
also a degree of inconsistency between Probation Services, region by region,
with strong leadership in some and less effective management in others and this
may compromise public safety in some districts.
Reports
highlight that probation systems often suffer from underfunding and fragmented
services leading to a varying quality of effectiveness, all of which limit
their ability to achieve the long-term goal of the rehabilitation of offenders.
However, probation is nonetheless a valuable tool for balancing rehabilitation,
cost savings and community safety. Its strengths lie in promoting reform,
reducing prison overcrowding and maintaining social ties while its weaknesses
stem chiefly from recidivism.
.


















































.jpg)




