![]() |
Grey squirrel in Abbey Gardens |
I suddenly noticed several months ago that the squirrels in the Abbey Gardens had almost disappeared. Before, the sight of numbers of them, scampering across the grass, hurtling themselves through throngs of pecking pigeons, or dashing up trees, among branches and down again with dizzying speed, was commonplace. And much enjoyed by most passers-by. And then came rather a squirrel desert in the Gardens.
I stopped to pass the time of day with a dog walker the other day; her dog was barking furiously, straining at the lead while looking up towards a mature tree. “He knows there’s a family of five squirrels up there” she explained, “ and he wants to get at them!” I confided my bewilderment at the sudden lack of squirrels around generally and she told me that she was pretty sure that the gardeners would have poisoned them. I was horrified! Only then did I learn that a year or two earlier, during a single night, the 280 expensive, special bulbs [“Bought from Holland”, she explained helpfully, to account for their assumed high value!] planted in the Abbey Garden flower beds, had been eaten by the squirrels. “The gardeners hate them,” she added. “They are vermin you know. My husband calls them tree rats.”Since
then, I have become a squirrel supporter, in sympathy with their
plight, and regret at the aesthetic loss to the Abbey Garden-scape.
In August's Literary Review I so
appreciated a review of Peter
Coates’ Squirrel Nation: Reds, Greys and The Meaning of
Home.” It recounts the
struggle between red and grey squirrels in Britain over
a century and a half. I
loved the title of the essay, “They come
over here, take our nuts ….”
an obvious echo of the popular chant during WW2 about American
soldiers. “Over-paid, over-sexed, over here.”
A rather curved photo showing a 1955 poster offering booty of One shilling per tail. |
![]() |
Prof. Peter Coates |
![]() |
Avi Steinberg |
Avi Steinberg writes [April 14, 2016], of what he labels “the Squirrel Problem”; he avers that underlying any discussion of Reds v Greys, lies the tacit assumption of the proximity between human and squirrel and further, that this close relationship means something. This ‘something’ is, the fact [often ignored], that we are party to a social contract with the squirrel. Unlike rabbits, rats, mice, deer, squirrels live on our level, in the open as if by right, and share many human traits. They save and plan ahead, obsessively; they make deposits and debits [mostly of nuts and seeds]; they establish highways and routes [always returning to familiar paths among and around trees]; they are attached for often long periods to their homes, [they can inhabit the same nest, re-furbished from time to time, for many years]; refrigerate staple foods like pine cones; dry delicacies like mushrooms. They work the day shift and sleep at night. And, Steinberg claims, they gamble in the market place. Most animals breed as food becomes available but squirrels have developed the ability to predict a future seed glut and reproduce accordingly. This is behaviour similar to that of the bullish investor!! David La Spina writes in the New York Times, “They are like us and right there with us , our honored frenemies.”
![]() |
Nicholas Lezard |
![]() |
Going Nuts is the title of this rare photo of a battle between red and grey. |
Illustration by R.J. Lloyd for Ted Hughes' broadside poem, Squirrel. 1986 |