![]() |
| Norman soldiers, depicted on the Bayeux Tapestry |
A most interesting take on the Bayeux Tapestry as it arrives in the UK for the first time in 950 years, in The Observer New Review, 30/08/2026. The article claims that experts now realise that it should be seen as a testament to terror and acknowledge that the women who created it, did so in order to survive. Interestingly, I happen to be writing on September 3rd, the anniversary of the beginning of WW2.
![]() |
| The Normans landing in Pevensey. |
![]() |
| Death of Harold. |
![]() |
| Harold wounded on the battlefield |
![]() |
| Battle scene. |
![]() |
| The Bayeux Tapestry on view in France. This photo gives some idea of the size of the Tapestry. |
![]() |
| Dialogue in Harold's encampment. |
![]() |
| Bishop Odo urging on the Norman troops. |
There is a strong research opinion that the Tapestry was probably commissioned by Bishop Odo of Bayeux [who is pictured on the Tapestry] for the Romanesque cathedral there but little proof. It was recorded in Church chronicles as present in Bayeux at the end of the fifteenth century but there are gaps in its history. A letter sent by the powerful Archbishop Lanfranc of Canterbury to the anonymous ‘Bishop G’ in the late 1070s refers to the women who, “fled to a monastery not for love of the religious life but out of fear of the
French, “while the monk and chronicler, Orderic Vitalis, also wrote of Anglo-Saxons seeking protection within convent walls.
Some academic researchers believe that it was not Odo who commissioned the Tapestry but that it may well have been by a powerful English woman, Edith of Wessex, sister of the aristocratic Harold Godwinson, and widow of Edward the Confessor, as a grand gesture of diplomacy. Bishop Odo however, had impeccable connections to be the prime contender; he was half-brother to William the Conqueror and as the Earl of Kent, would undoubtedly have known of the skills of the Kentish embroiderers through his involvement in the building of England’s first Norman church in the familiar Kentish marsh area of Romney. It is also possible that the Tapestry could well have been made in Canterbury by nuns there, though Barking Abbey in East London also has strong claims for authorship. Barking Abbey was an extremely high-status site strongly connected to both Church and State and perfectly placed for locally sourcing the materials needed for the compilation of the important banner.
![]() |
| In Bayeux, ongoing repairs to the precious tapestry. In England, the Bayeux Tapestry is displayed lying down. |
1.It is not a tapestry but rather an embroidered wall hanging.
2.It was not made in Bayeux.
3.It was not Harold with the arrow in
his eye, as depicted in the embroidery; he is the man nearby, lying wounded on
the ground as he dies. The man with the arrow was probably a random, though unfortunate,
wounded soldier serving in the narration, as a representative of the countless wounded in the story but misidentified as Harold.
4. The Bayeux Tapestry which could have been equally
called the Barking Embroidery or the Canterbury Mural, shows the horrors of war
and enemy occupation but, importantly and unusually, the story is told by the
vanquished, not the victors. The victors must have considered the Bayeux Tapestry a
s a chronicle of power and glory but the women, the embroiderers, were sewing for their lives.
5. The Bayeux Tapestry resides in France, in Normandy, but its narrative lies chiefly in Kent with its storied roots in Normandy. Thus, the current exhibition at the British Museum, is an Anglo-French collaboration, strongly led by President Macron, telling an Anglo-French hybrid story which covers the past 1000 years.
![]() |
| Preparing for Anglo-Saxon/Norman dialogue. |
![]() |
| Bishop Odo of Bayeux His title provided the name for The Bayeux Tapestry. |
;








































